Replies: 3 comments
-
|
💬 Your Product Feedback Has Been Submitted 🎉 Thank you for taking the time to share your insights with us! Your feedback is invaluable as we build a better GitHub experience for all our users. Here's what you can expect moving forward ⏩
Where to look to see what's shipping 👀
What you can do in the meantime 💻
As a member of the GitHub community, your participation is essential. While we can't promise that every suggestion will be implemented, we want to emphasize that your feedback is instrumental in guiding our decisions and priorities. Thank you once again for your contribution to making GitHub even better! We're grateful for your ongoing support and collaboration in shaping the future of our platform. ⭐ |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
|
I feel like this limitation is becoming an own goal for GitHub Copilot. By preventing engineers from using a personal Copilot subscription for their experimentation, learning, and hobby projects, while simultaneously holding a Business/Enterprise seat for work, GitHub is unintentionally pushing developers toward competitors. People naturally want to explore AI tools outside of work, and if Copilot can't be used in that context, they will learn and grow comfortable with alternative products. Inevitably, those same developers will then advocate for those competing tools inside their companies. This feels counterproductive and very unlike the long‑standing Microsoft strategy of empowering professionals to use the same tools across personal and professional contexts, which historically helped consolidate loyalty and familiarity. Allowing dual licensing on a single GitHub account would solve this cleanly, avoid fragmentation, and keep developers within the GitHub ecosystem across all parts of their work. We’ve already seen that GitHub can adapt licensing models when the community pushes back. The recent change allowing students to purchase individual Copilot plans, while still keeping their other student benefits, came directly after the backlash around losing access to the better models. That decision showed that GitHub is willing and able to introduce flexible licensing paths when it benefits learning, adoption, and long‑term loyalty. The same principle applies here: professionals who want to invest personally in Microsoft tooling outside of work should be supported, not pushed toward competitors simply because the current licensing model blocks them from using Copilot in their own time. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
-
Select Topic Area
Product Feedback
Body
First, I am fully aware that the current recommendation is to use a second GitHub account. Please don't comment just to say that.
I've found alot of discussions on this topic, but haven't found one that is clearly a feature request.
Request
Please add the ability to have multiple Copilot licenses, both personal and business, under one user account.
Background
I am required by the company I work for to not use work resources for personal/opensource projects.
I have GitHub Copilot for Business from the company I work for.
I want the ability to have GitHub Copilot for individual for personal/opensource projects I work on.
I don't want to have to create a separate GitHub account for work and personal. It's really nice having all contributions under one account.
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions