Skip to content

[ALICE3] IOTOF: allow reduced sensor thickness wihout reducing chip size#15247

Open
njacazio wants to merge 8 commits intodevfrom
njacazio-patch-2
Open

[ALICE3] IOTOF: allow reduced sensor thickness wihout reducing chip size#15247
njacazio wants to merge 8 commits intodevfrom
njacazio-patch-2

Conversation

@njacazio
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

Added sensor thickness parameter and validation checks.

Added sensor thickness parameter and validation checks.
@github-actions
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

REQUEST FOR PRODUCTION RELEASES:
To request your PR to be included in production software, please add the corresponding labels called "async-" to your PR. Add the labels directly (if you have the permissions) or add a comment of the form (note that labels are separated by a ",")

+async-label <label1>, <label2>, !<label3> ...

This will add <label1> and <label2> and removes <label3>.

The following labels are available
async-2023-pbpb-apass4
async-2023-pp-apass4
async-2024-pp-apass1
async-2022-pp-apass7
async-2024-pp-cpass0
async-2024-PbPb-apass1
async-2024-ppRef-apass1
async-2024-PbPb-apass2
async-2023-PbPb-apass5

Added sensor thickness parameter to Layer constructor and updated member variables accordingly.
Added sensorThickness parameter to configLayers function for ITOF and OTOF layers.
Updated the radiation length thickness and added sensor thickness parameter.
Updated options table with new sensor thickness parameter and corrected default value for x2x0.
@njacazio njacazio changed the title Enhance Layer class with sensor thickness handling [ALICE3] IOTOF: allow reduced sensor thickness wihout reducing chip size Mar 31, 2026
@njacazio njacazio marked this pull request as ready for review March 31, 2026 16:07
@njacazio njacazio requested a review from mconcas as a code owner March 31, 2026 16:07
Removed sensor thickness adjustment for chip size calculation.
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant