Skip to content

Remove the need for a picker id during classification#764

Open
stephen-riggs wants to merge 2 commits intomainfrom
no-picker-id
Open

Remove the need for a picker id during classification#764
stephen-riggs wants to merge 2 commits intomainfrom
no-picker-id

Conversation

@stephen-riggs
Copy link
Contributor

Inserting the picker id into the ParticleClassificationGroup table in ispyb creates a race condition which we have previously worked around. Given the picker id is optional we should just not do this. Particularly needed for doppio live.

May need a change to pato before this is safe to merge

@codecov
Copy link

codecov bot commented Mar 23, 2026

Codecov Report

❌ Patch coverage is 0% with 1 line in your changes missing coverage. Please review.
✅ Project coverage is 49.64%. Comparing base (cd967b5) to head (ca56aa1).

Additional details and impacted files
@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main     #764      +/-   ##
==========================================
+ Coverage   49.46%   49.64%   +0.17%     
==========================================
  Files          92       92              
  Lines        9793     9744      -49     
  Branches     1283     1274       -9     
==========================================
- Hits         4844     4837       -7     
+ Misses       4709     4667      -42     
  Partials      240      240              
🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
  • ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant