Skip to content

[Snyk] Security upgrade functions_framework from 0.7.0 to 0.7.1#335

Open
benjaminhuo wants to merge 1 commit intomainfrom
snyk-fix-a0ab7b811b89ec703bc53943e5d15d95
Open

[Snyk] Security upgrade functions_framework from 0.7.0 to 0.7.1#335
benjaminhuo wants to merge 1 commit intomainfrom
snyk-fix-a0ab7b811b89ec703bc53943e5d15d95

Conversation

@benjaminhuo
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

snyk-top-banner

Snyk has created this PR to fix 2 vulnerabilities in the rubygems dependencies of this project.

Snyk changed the following file(s):

  • builders/testdata/ruby/functions/with_env_var/Gemfile
  • builders/testdata/ruby/functions/with_env_var/Gemfile.lock

Vulnerabilities that will be fixed with an upgrade:

Issue Score
medium severity Interpretation Conflict
SNYK-RUBY-RACK-15878035
  601  
medium severity Improper Handling of Length Parameter Inconsistency
SNYK-RUBY-RACK-15878237
  601  

Important

  • Check the changes in this PR to ensure they won't cause issues with your project.
  • Max score is 1000. Note that the real score may have changed since the PR was raised.
  • This PR was automatically created by Snyk using the credentials of a real user.

Note: You are seeing this because you or someone else with access to this repository has authorized Snyk to open fix PRs.

For more information:
🧐 View latest project report
📜 Customise PR templates
🛠 Adjust project settings
📚 Read about Snyk's upgrade logic


Learn how to fix vulnerabilities with free interactive lessons:

🦉 Learn about vulnerability in an interactive lesson of Snyk Learn.

…/testdata/ruby/functions/with_env_var/Gemfile.lock to reduce vulnerabilities

The following vulnerabilities are fixed with an upgrade:
- https://snyk.io/vuln/SNYK-RUBY-RACK-15878035
- https://snyk.io/vuln/SNYK-RUBY-RACK-15878237
@CLAassistant
Copy link
Copy Markdown

CLA assistant check
Thank you for your submission! We really appreciate it. Like many open source projects, we ask that you sign our Contributor License Agreement before we can accept your contribution.
You have signed the CLA already but the status is still pending? Let us recheck it.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants