Merged
Conversation
…parisons The nested timer tests compared performance timing values using exact equality via toMatchObject. Due to floating-point arithmetic precision, values like `a + b` can differ from separately measured durations by tiny amounts (e.g. 11.820208999999977 vs 11.82020900000009), causing intermittent failures. Replace exact equality with expect.closeTo(value, 5) which tolerates differences smaller than 1e-5 — more than sufficient for millisecond-level timing measurements.
Contributor
|
We detected some changes at Caution DO NOT create changesets for features which you do not wish to be included in the public changelog of the next CLI release. |
ryancbahan
approved these changes
Apr 7, 2026
Contributor
Author
Merge activity
|
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
WHY are these changes introduced?
The nested timer tests compared performance timing values using exact equality via toMatchObject. Due to floating-point arithmetic precision, values like
a + bcan differ from separately measured durations by tiny amounts (e.g. 11.820208999999977 vs 11.82020900000009), causing intermittent failures.Failure example:
WHAT is this pull request doing?
Replace exact equality with expect.closeTo(value, 5) which tolerates differences smaller than 1e-5 — more than sufficient for millisecond-level timing measurements.
How to test your changes?
CI
Measuring impact
How do we know this change was effective? Please choose one:
Checklist