Skip to content

[HEALTH] 4.20 Health Check, please don't merge this!#10668

Draft
yadvr wants to merge 1 commit into4.20from
healthcheck-4.20
Draft

[HEALTH] 4.20 Health Check, please don't merge this!#10668
yadvr wants to merge 1 commit into4.20from
healthcheck-4.20

Conversation

@yadvr
Copy link
Member

@yadvr yadvr commented Apr 8, 2025

For kicking smoketests on 4.20 branch

@yadvr
Copy link
Member Author

yadvr commented Apr 8, 2025

@blueorangutan package

@yadvr yadvr added this to the 4.20.1 milestone Apr 8, 2025
@DaanHoogland
Copy link
Contributor

@blueorangutan test matrix

@Pearl1594
Copy link
Contributor

@blueorangutan package

@sureshanaparti
Copy link
Contributor

@blueorangutan test matrix

@yadvr yadvr closed this Apr 15, 2025
@yadvr yadvr reopened this Apr 15, 2025
@Pearl1594
Copy link
Contributor

@blueorangutan test ol8 xcpng76

@yadvr
Copy link
Member Author

yadvr commented Apr 17, 2025

@blueorangutan package

1 similar comment
@DaanHoogland
Copy link
Contributor

@blueorangutan package

@DaanHoogland
Copy link
Contributor

@blueorangutan test matrix

@Pearl1594
Copy link
Contributor

@blueorangutan package

@Pearl1594
Copy link
Contributor

@blueorangutan test ol8 vmware-70u3

@Pearl1594
Copy link
Contributor

the DRS tests on Xen / XCP 8.x onwards fails with the following error:

nameLabel: Async.VM.pool_migrate
     nameDescription: 
   allowedOperations: []
   currentOperations: {}
             created: Mon Apr 21 11:39:13 UTC 2025
            finished: Mon Apr 21 11:39:13 UTC 2025
              status: failure
          residentOn: com.xensource.xenapi.Host@a4064fa5
            progress: 1.0
                type: <none/>
              result: 
           errorInfo: [VM_LACKS_FEATURE, OpaqueRef:d954a158-61f1-4397-b68d-d50cbfe69631]
         otherConfig: {}
           subtaskOf: com.xensource.xenapi.Task@aaf13f6f
            subtasks: []
            

VM seems to need guest tools installed to proceed. However, this seemed to work for Xen / XCP < 8.

@Pearl1594
Copy link
Contributor

@blueorangutan package

@Pearl1594
Copy link
Contributor

@blueorangutan test matrix

@DaanHoogland
Copy link
Contributor

@blueorangutan package

@DaanHoogland
Copy link
Contributor

@blueorangutan test matrix

@Pearl1594
Copy link
Contributor

@blueorangutan package

@Pearl1594
Copy link
Contributor

@blueorangutan test matrix

@codecov
Copy link

codecov bot commented Apr 28, 2025

Codecov Report

✅ All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests.
✅ Project coverage is 16.25%. Comparing base (61afb4c) to head (f1a83f0).

Additional details and impacted files
@@            Coverage Diff            @@
##               4.20   #10668   +/-   ##
=========================================
  Coverage     16.24%   16.25%           
- Complexity    13411    13413    +2     
=========================================
  Files          5664     5664           
  Lines        500463   500463           
  Branches      60779    60779           
=========================================
+ Hits          81308    81333   +25     
+ Misses       410059   410035   -24     
+ Partials       9096     9095    -1     
Flag Coverage Δ
uitests 4.15% <ø> (ø)
unittests 17.10% <ø> (+<0.01%) ⬆️

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
  • ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.
  • 📦 JS Bundle Analysis: Save yourself from yourself by tracking and limiting bundle sizes in JS merges.

@blueorangutan
Copy link

@sureshanaparti a [SL] Jenkins job has been kicked to build packages. It will be bundled with KVM, XenServer and VMware SystemVM templates. I'll keep you posted as I make progress.

@blueorangutan
Copy link

Packaging result [SF]: ✔️ el8 ✔️ el9 ✔️ el10 ✔️ debian ✔️ suse15. SL-JID 16725

@DaanHoogland
Copy link
Contributor

@blueorangutan test matrix

1 similar comment
@DaanHoogland
Copy link
Contributor

@blueorangutan test matrix

@DaanHoogland
Copy link
Contributor

@blueorangutan package

@abh1sar
Copy link
Contributor

abh1sar commented Feb 14, 2026

@blueorangutan test matrix

1 similar comment
@abh1sar
Copy link
Contributor

abh1sar commented Feb 17, 2026

@blueorangutan test matrix

@DaanHoogland
Copy link
Contributor

@blueorangutan package

@abh1sar
Copy link
Contributor

abh1sar commented Feb 23, 2026

@blueorangutan test matrix

@DaanHoogland
Copy link
Contributor

@blueorangutan package

3 similar comments
@DaanHoogland
Copy link
Contributor

@blueorangutan package

@sureshanaparti
Copy link
Contributor

@blueorangutan package

@DaanHoogland
Copy link
Contributor

@blueorangutan package

@blueorangutan
Copy link

@DaanHoogland a [SL] Jenkins job has been kicked to build packages. It will be bundled with KVM, XenServer and VMware SystemVM templates. I'll keep you posted as I make progress.

@blueorangutan
Copy link

Packaging result [SF]: ✔️ el8 ✔️ el9 ✔️ el10 ✔️ debian ✔️ suse15. SL-JID 17155

@DaanHoogland
Copy link
Contributor

@blueorangutan test matrix

@blueorangutan
Copy link

@DaanHoogland a [SL] Trillian-Jenkins matrix job (EL8 mgmt + EL8 KVM, Ubuntu22 mgmt + Ubuntu22 KVM, EL8 mgmt + VMware 7.0u3, EL9 mgmt + XCP-ng 8.2 ) has been kicked to run smoke tests

Signed-off-by: Abhishek Kumar <abhishek.mrt22@gmail.com>
@DaanHoogland
Copy link
Contributor

@blueorangutan package

@blueorangutan
Copy link

@DaanHoogland a [SL] Jenkins job has been kicked to build packages. It will be bundled with KVM, XenServer and VMware SystemVM templates. I'll keep you posted as I make progress.

@blueorangutan
Copy link

Packaging result [SF]: ✔️ el8 ✔️ el9 ✔️ el10 ✔️ debian ✔️ suse15. SL-JID 17159

@sonarqubecloud
Copy link

@DaanHoogland
Copy link
Contributor

@blueorangutan test matrix

@blueorangutan
Copy link

@DaanHoogland a [SL] Trillian-Jenkins matrix job (EL8 mgmt + EL8 KVM, Ubuntu22 mgmt + Ubuntu22 KVM, EL8 mgmt + VMware 7.0u3, EL9 mgmt + XCP-ng 8.2 ) has been kicked to run smoke tests

@blueorangutan
Copy link

[SF] Trillian Build Failed (tid-15675)

@blueorangutan
Copy link

[SF] Trillian test result (tid-15666)
Environment: kvm-ol8 (x2), zone: Advanced Networking with Mgmt server ol8
Total time taken: 56055 seconds
Marvin logs: https://github.com/blueorangutan/acs-prs/releases/download/trillian/pr10668-t15666-kvm-ol8.zip
Smoke tests completed. 140 look OK, 1 have errors, 0 did not run
Only failed and skipped tests results shown below:

Test Result Time (s) Test File
test_01_RVR_Network_FW_PF_SSH_default_routes_egress_true Failure 211.59 test_routers_network_ops.py

@blueorangutan
Copy link

[SF] Trillian test result (tid-15667)
Environment: kvm-ubuntu22 (x2), zone: Advanced Networking with Mgmt server u22
Total time taken: 59206 seconds
Marvin logs: https://github.com/blueorangutan/acs-prs/releases/download/trillian/pr10668-t15667-kvm-ubuntu22.zip
Smoke tests completed. 141 look OK, 0 have errors, 0 did not run
Only failed and skipped tests results shown below:

Test Result Time (s) Test File

@blueorangutan
Copy link

[SF] Trillian test result (tid-15669)
Environment: xcpng82 (x2), zone: Advanced Networking with Mgmt server ol9
Total time taken: 61257 seconds
Marvin logs: https://github.com/blueorangutan/acs-prs/releases/download/trillian/pr10668-t15669-xcpng82.zip
Smoke tests completed. 141 look OK, 0 have errors, 0 did not run
Only failed and skipped tests results shown below:

Test Result Time (s) Test File

@blueorangutan
Copy link

[SF] Trillian test result (tid-15668)
Environment: vmware-70u3 (x2), zone: Advanced Networking with Mgmt server ol8
Total time taken: 63793 seconds
Marvin logs: https://github.com/blueorangutan/acs-prs/releases/download/trillian/pr10668-t15668-vmware-70u3.zip
Smoke tests completed. 140 look OK, 1 have errors, 0 did not run
Only failed and skipped tests results shown below:

Test Result Time (s) Test File
test_deploy_more_vms_than_limit_allows Error 208.92 test_deploy_vms_in_parallel.py

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

9 participants