CKS: fix resource limitation check on cpu when scale cks cluster

[weizhouapache]

Description

This PR fixes the smoke test failure

   test_03_deploy_and_scale_kubernetes_cluster | `Failure` | 44.28 | test_kubernetes_clusters.py

Types of changes

• Breaking change (fix or feature that would cause existing functionality to change)
• New feature (non-breaking change which adds functionality)
• Bug fix (non-breaking change which fixes an issue)
• Enhancement (improves an existing feature and functionality)
• Cleanup (Code refactoring and cleanup, that may add test cases)
• Build/CI
• Test (unit or integration test code)

Feature/Enhancement Scale or Bug Severity

Feature/Enhancement Scale

• Major
• Minor

Bug Severity

• BLOCKER
• Critical
• Major
• Minor
• Trivial

Screenshots (if appropriate):

How Has This Been Tested?

How did you try to break this feature and the system with this change?

[weizhouapache]

@blueorangutan package

[blueorangutan]

@weizhouapache a [SL] Jenkins job has been kicked to build packages. It will be bundled with KVM, XenServer and VMware SystemVM templates. I'll keep you posted as I make progress.

[codecov]

Codecov Report

❌ Patch coverage is 0% with 1 line in your changes missing coverage. Please review.
✅ Project coverage is 17.59%. Comparing base (2d4b7ba) to head (d1bdbde).
⚠️ Report is 29 commits behind head on 4.22.

Files with missing lines	Patch %	Lines
...bernetes/cluster/KubernetesClusterManagerImpl.java	0.00%	1 Missing ⚠️

Additional details and impacted files

@@             Coverage Diff              @@
##               4.22   #12379      +/-   ##
============================================
- Coverage     17.59%   17.59%   -0.01%     
+ Complexity    15596    15595       -1     
============================================
  Files          5910     5910              
  Lines        529634   529633       -1     
  Branches      64714    64714              
============================================
- Hits          93176    93172       -4     
- Misses       425968   425969       +1     
- Partials      10490    10492       +2     

Flag	Coverage Δ
uitests	3.57% <ø> (ø)
unittests	18.66% <0.00%> (-0.01%)	⬇️

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:

• ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.
• 📦 JS Bundle Analysis: Save yourself from yourself by tracking and limiting bundle sizes in JS merges.

[blueorangutan]

Packaging result [SF]: ✔️ el8 ✔️ el9 ✔️ el10 ✖️ debian ✔️ suse15. SL-JID 16273

[shwstppr]

code lgtm

[weizhouapache]

@blueorangutan package

[blueorangutan]

@weizhouapache a [SL] Jenkins job has been kicked to build packages. It will be bundled with KVM, XenServer and VMware SystemVM templates. I'll keep you posted as I make progress.

[blueorangutan]

Packaging result [SF]: ✔️ el8 ✔️ el9 ✔️ el10 ✔️ debian ✔️ suse15. SL-JID 16278

[weizhouapache]

@blueorangutan test

[blueorangutan]

@weizhouapache a [SL] Trillian-Jenkins test job (ol8 mgmt + kvm-ol8) has been kicked to run smoke tests

[blueorangutan]

[SF] Trillian test result (tid-15130)
Environment: kvm-ol8 (x2), zone: Advanced Networking with Mgmt server ol8
Total time taken: 54098 seconds
Marvin logs: https://github.com/blueorangutan/acs-prs/releases/download/trillian/pr12379-t15130-kvm-ol8.zip
Smoke tests completed. 148 look OK, 1 have errors, 0 did not run
Only failed and skipped tests results shown below:

Test	Result	Time (s)	Test File
test_01_vpn_usage	Error	1.10	test_usage.py

[weizhouapache]

this is regression of #12167

@Pearl1594 @DaanHoogland
does this look good to you ?

[DaanHoogland]

this is regression of #12167

@Pearl1594 @DaanHoogland does this look good to you ?

yes, wasn’t a similar change done recently?

[weizhouapache]

this is regression of #12167
@Pearl1594 @DaanHoogland does this look good to you ?

yes, wasn’t a similar change done recently?

I do not remember it, sorry @DaanHoogland

[DaanHoogland]

does it still need testing?