test: fix test_guest_os.py failure on xcpng82

[weizhouapache]

Description

This PR is related to #8586

on xenserver-71, supported Debian OSes are

          name-label ( RW): Debian Squeeze 6.0 (32-bit)
          name-label ( RW): Debian Jessie 8.0
          name-label ( RW): Debian Wheezy 7.0 (32-bit)
          name-label ( RW): Debian Squeeze 6.0 (64-bit)
          name-label ( RW): Debian Wheezy 7.0 (64-bit)

on xcpng82, supported Debian OSes are

          name-label ( RW): Debian Jessie 8.0
          name-label ( RW): Debian Buster 10
          name-label ( RW): Debian Stretch 9.0

Types of changes

• Breaking change (fix or feature that would cause existing functionality to change)
• New feature (non-breaking change which adds functionality)
• Bug fix (non-breaking change which fixes an issue)
• Enhancement (improves an existing feature and functionality)
• Cleanup (Code refactoring and cleanup, that may add test cases)
• build/CI

Feature/Enhancement Scale or Bug Severity

Feature/Enhancement Scale

• Major
• Minor

Bug Severity

• BLOCKER
• Critical
• Major
• Minor
• Trivial

Screenshots (if appropriate):

How Has This Been Tested?

How did you try to break this feature and the system with this change?

[weizhouapache]

@blueorangutan package

[blueorangutan]

@weizhouapache a [SL] Jenkins job has been kicked to build packages. It will be bundled with KVM, XenServer and VMware SystemVM templates. I'll keep you posted as I make progress.

[codecov]

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Comparison is base (bda49ab) 30.90% compared to head (d144ccf) 30.90%.
Report is 2 commits behind head on 4.19.

Additional details and impacted files

@@             Coverage Diff              @@
##               4.19    #8659      +/-   ##
============================================
- Coverage     30.90%   30.90%   -0.01%     
+ Complexity    34189    34177      -12     
============================================
  Files          5347     5347              
  Lines        375566   375566              
  Branches      54625    54625              
============================================
- Hits         116068   116054      -14     
- Misses       244236   244243       +7     
- Partials      15262    15269       +7     

Flag	Coverage Δ
simulator-marvin-tests	24.75% <ø> (-0.01%)	⬇️
uitests	4.39% <ø> (ø)
unit-tests	16.55% <ø> (+<0.01%)	⬆️

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

[blueorangutan]

Packaging result [SF]: ✔️ el7 ✔️ el8 ✔️ el9 ✔️ debian ✔️ suse15. SL-JID 8663

[sureshanaparti]

clgtm

[weizhouapache]

@blueorangutan package

[blueorangutan]

@weizhouapache a [SL] Jenkins job has been kicked to build packages. It will be bundled with KVM, XenServer and VMware SystemVM templates. I'll keep you posted as I make progress.

[blueorangutan]

Packaging result [SF]: ✔️ el7 ✔️ el8 ✔️ el9 ✔️ debian ✔️ suse15. SL-JID 8670

[weizhouapache]

@blueorangutan test rocky8 xenserver-71

[blueorangutan]

@weizhouapache a [SL] Trillian-Jenkins test job (rocky8 mgmt + xenserver-71) has been kicked to run smoke tests

[weizhouapache]

@blueorangutan test rocky8 xcpng-82

[blueorangutan]

@weizhouapache [SL] unsupported parameters provided. Supported mgmt server os are: centos7, centos6, suse15, alma8, ubuntu18, ubuntu22, ubuntu20, rocky8, alma9. Supported hypervisors are: kvm-centos6, kvm-centos7, kvm-rocky8, kvm-alma8, kvm-alma9, kvm-ubuntu18, kvm-ubuntu20, kvm-ubuntu22, kvm-suse15, vmware-55u3, vmware-60u2, vmware-65u2, vmware-67u3, vmware-70u1, vmware-70u2, vmware-70u3, vmware-80, vmware-80u1, xenserver-65sp1, xenserver-71, xenserver-74, xcpng74, xcpng76, xcpng80, xcpng81, xcpng82

[weizhouapache]

@blueorangutan test rocky8 xcpng82

[blueorangutan]

@weizhouapache a [SL] Trillian-Jenkins test job (rocky8 mgmt + xcpng82) has been kicked to run smoke tests

[blueorangutan]

[SF] Trillian test result (tid-9238)
Environment: xenserver-71 (x2), Advanced Networking with Mgmt server r8
Total time taken: 41358 seconds
Marvin logs: https://github.com/blueorangutan/acs-prs/releases/download/trillian/pr8659-t9238-xenserver-71.zip
Smoke tests completed. 129 look OK, 0 have errors, 0 did not run
Only failed and skipped tests results shown below:

Test	Result	Time (s)	Test File

[blueorangutan]

[SF] Trillian test result (tid-9242)
Environment: xcpng82 (x2), Advanced Networking with Mgmt server r8
Total time taken: 65899 seconds
Marvin logs: https://github.com/blueorangutan/acs-prs/releases/download/trillian/pr8659-t9242-xcpng82.zip
Smoke tests completed. 125 look OK, 4 have errors, 0 did not run
Only failed and skipped tests results shown below:

Test	Result	Time (s)	Test File
test_01_condensed_drs_algorithm	Failure	172.28	test_cluster_drs.py
test_02_balanced_drs_algorithm	Failure	178.35	test_cluster_drs.py
test_01_non_strict_host_anti_affinity	Error	205.96	test_nonstrict_affinity_group.py
test_02_non_strict_host_affinity	Error	121.93	test_nonstrict_affinity_group.py
test_deploy_vm_with_registered_userdata	Error	840.48	test_register_userdata.py
test_deploy_vm_with_registered_userdata_with_override_policy_allow	Error	836.41	test_register_userdata.py
test_deploy_vm_with_registered_userdata_with_override_policy_append	Error	860.03	test_register_userdata.py
test_deploy_vm_with_registered_userdata_with_params	Error	826.53	test_register_userdata.py
test_01_deploy_vm_on_specific_host	Error	0.12	test_vm_deployment_planner.py
test_02_deploy_vm_on_specific_cluster	Error	0.09	test_vm_deployment_planner.py
test_03_deploy_vm_on_specific_pod	Error	0.13	test_vm_deployment_planner.py
test_04_deploy_vm_on_host_override_pod_and_cluster	Error	0.14	test_vm_deployment_planner.py
test_05_deploy_vm_on_cluster_override_pod	Error	0.10	test_vm_deployment_planner.py

[DaanHoogland]

Therre are many failures on xcpng82 still. Are these related, @weizhouapache ?
Should we create separate issues/PRs for those?

[weizhouapache]

Therre are many failures on xcpng82 still. Are these related, @weizhouapache ?
Should we create separate issues/PRs for those?

Hi @DaanHoogland
Please check #8586