Complete doc string examples for functions.py#1435
Draft
ntjohnson1 wants to merge 16 commits intoapache:mainfrom
Draft
Complete doc string examples for functions.py#1435ntjohnson1 wants to merge 16 commits intoapache:mainfrom
ntjohnson1 wants to merge 16 commits intoapache:mainfrom
Conversation
Add example usage to docstrings for Aggregate window functions to improve documentation. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.6 <noreply@anthropic.com>
…docstrings-agg-window
…docstrings-agg-window
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Which issue does this PR close?
Closes #1434 and #1433
Rationale for this change
Added coverage over MOST functions in functions.py with examples but split things up to be reviewable. There were a couple global notes that got lost across the many PRs
This relies on #1418 landing first since I branched from there.
This PR isn't as large as the diff suggests because a lot of changes are simple formatting. Reviewing by commit should make it much easier.