Skip to content

[Snyk] Security upgrade cypress from 9.5.1 to 13.0.0#30

Open
q1blue wants to merge 1 commit intomasterfrom
snyk-fix-111fa74318b761456e726ec7c365421a
Open

[Snyk] Security upgrade cypress from 9.5.1 to 13.0.0#30
q1blue wants to merge 1 commit intomasterfrom
snyk-fix-111fa74318b761456e726ec7c365421a

Conversation

@q1blue
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

@q1blue q1blue commented Jan 12, 2026

snyk-top-banner

Snyk has created this PR to fix 1 vulnerabilities in the npm dependencies of this project.

Snyk changed the following file(s):

  • package.json
  • package-lock.json

Vulnerabilities that will be fixed with an upgrade:

Issue Score
high severity Allocation of Resources Without Limits or Throttling
SNYK-JS-QS-14724253
  169  

Important

  • Check the changes in this PR to ensure they won't cause issues with your project.
  • Max score is 1000. Note that the real score may have changed since the PR was raised.
  • This PR was automatically created by Snyk using the credentials of a real user.

Note: You are seeing this because you or someone else with access to this repository has authorized Snyk to open fix PRs.

For more information:
🧐 View latest project report
📜 Customise PR templates
🛠 Adjust project settings
📚 Read about Snyk's upgrade logic


Learn how to fix vulnerabilities with free interactive lessons:

🦉 Allocation of Resources Without Limits or Throttling


Important

Upgrade cypress to 13.0.0 to fix a high severity vulnerability in resource allocation.

  • Dependencies:
    • Upgrade cypress from 9.5.1 to 13.0.0 in package.json and package-lock.json to fix a high severity vulnerability.
  • Vulnerability:
    • Fixes "Allocation of Resources Without Limits or Throttling" vulnerability (SNYK-JS-QS-14724253).

This description was created by Ellipsis for 7d55bec. You can customize this summary. It will automatically update as commits are pushed.

@bolt-new-by-stackblitz
Copy link
Copy Markdown

Review PR in StackBlitz Codeflow Run & review this pull request in StackBlitz Codeflow.

@changeset-bot
Copy link
Copy Markdown

changeset-bot bot commented Jan 12, 2026

⚠️ No Changeset found

Latest commit: 7d55bec

Merging this PR will not cause a version bump for any packages. If these changes should not result in a new version, you're good to go. If these changes should result in a version bump, you need to add a changeset.

Click here to learn what changesets are, and how to add one.

Click here if you're a maintainer who wants to add a changeset to this PR

Copy link
Copy Markdown

@ellipsis-dev ellipsis-dev bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Important

Looks good to me! 👍

Reviewed everything up to 7d55bec in 20 seconds. Click for details.
  • Reviewed 13 lines of code in 1 files
  • Skipped 1 files when reviewing.
  • Skipped posting 1 draft comments. View those below.
  • Modify your settings and rules to customize what types of comments Ellipsis leaves. And don't forget to react with 👍 or 👎 to teach Ellipsis.
1. package.json:15
  • Draft comment:
    Major version bump to Cypress 13.0.0 detected. This upgrade can introduce breaking changes (e.g., config/API adjustments introduced since v10). Please review Cypress release notes and update your test setup and configurations accordingly.
  • Reason this comment was not posted:
    Comment did not seem useful. Confidence is useful = 0% <= threshold 50% This comment is about a major version bump of a dependency, Cypress, to version 13.0.0. It warns about potential breaking changes and advises reviewing release notes and updating configurations. However, it doesn't provide a specific code suggestion or ask for a specific test to be written. It falls under the category of comments that are not allowed, as it is asking the author to ensure compatibility and review documentation, which is not specific enough.

Workflow ID: wflow_eKVQ7SgjFqHoc4gc

You can customize Ellipsis by changing your verbosity settings, reacting with 👍 or 👎, replying to comments, or adding code review rules.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants