Fix crash on lambda in generic context with generic method in body#15155
Merged
JukkaL merged 2 commits intopython:masterfrom May 2, 2023
Merged
Fix crash on lambda in generic context with generic method in body#15155JukkaL merged 2 commits intopython:masterfrom
JukkaL merged 2 commits intopython:masterfrom
Conversation
Member
Author
|
@hauntsaninja FYI "Comment with mypy_primer diff" workflow failed with |
Collaborator
|
Ugh, fixing #15156 |
Contributor
|
Diff from mypy_primer, showing the effect of this PR on open source code: graphql-core (https://github.com/graphql-python/graphql-core) got 1.05x slower (312.0s -> 329.1s)
|
JukkaL
approved these changes
May 2, 2023
Collaborator
JukkaL
left a comment
JukkaL
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Sounds reasonable. Thanks!
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
3 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Fixes #15060
The example in the issue contains another case where an erased type may legitimately appear in a generic function. Namely, when we have a lambda in a generic context, and its body contains a call to a generic method. First, since we infer the type of lambda in erased context, some of lambda parameters may get assigned a type containing erased components. Then, when accessing a generic method on such type we may get a callable that is both generic and has erased components, thus causing the crash (actually there are two very similar crashes depending on the details of the generic method).
Provided that we now have two legitimate cases for erased type appearing in
expand_type(), and special-casing (enabling) them would be tricky (a lot of functions will need to haveallow_erased_callables), I propose to simply remove the check.