feat: support linux arm

[zhoujh01]

Description

Related Issue

Type of Change

• Bug fix (non-breaking change that fixes an issue)
• New feature (non-breaking change that adds functionality)
• Breaking change (fix or feature that would cause existing functionality to not work as expected)
• Documentation update
• Refactoring (no functional changes)
• Performance improvement
• Test update

Changes Made

Testing

• I have added tests that prove my fix is effective or that my feature works
• New and existing unit tests pass locally with my changes
• I have tested this on the following platforms:
  • Linux
  • macOS
  • Windows

Checklist

• My code follows the project's coding style
• I have performed a self-review of my code
• I have commented my code, particularly in hard-to-understand areas
• I have made corresponding changes to the documentation
• My changes generate no new warnings
• Any dependent changes have been merged and published

Screenshots (if applicable)

Additional Notes

[github-actions]

PR Reviewer Guide 🔍

Here are some key observations to aid the review process:

⏱️ Estimated effort to review: 3 🔵🔵🔵⚪⚪

🧪 No relevant tests

🔒 No security concerns identified

⚡ Recommended focus areas for review Complex Matrix Arch Expression The arch matrix expression is overly complex and relies on operator precedence, which could lead to unexpected behavior. Consider simplifying for readability and maintainability. arch: ${{ contains(inputs.os_json, 'linux') && fromJson('["x86_64","aarch64"]') || (contains(inputs.os_json, 'ubuntu-latest') && contains(inputs.os_json, 'ubuntu-24.04-arm')) && fromJson('["x86_64","aarch64"]') || contains(inputs.os_json, 'ubuntu-24.04-arm') && fromJson('["aarch64"]') || fromJson('["x86_64"]') }} Container Version Compatibility The build-linux job uses ubuntu:20.04 container for both x86_64 and aarch64 runners. Verify that Ubuntu 20.04 container works correctly on Ubuntu 24.04 ARM host. container: ubuntu:20.04

[qin-ctx]

/description

[github-actions]

PR Code Suggestions ✨

Explore these optional code suggestions:

Category	Suggestion	Impact
Possible issue	Restore general Ubuntu runner check The current condition only triggers for specific Ubuntu labels, breaking support for custom Ubuntu runners (e.g., ubuntu-22.04). Revert to checking for the general 'ubuntu' substring to cover all Ubuntu-based runners, including the new ubuntu-24.04-arm. .github/workflows/_build.yml [120-126] -if: >- - inputs.build_wheels && - ( - contains(inputs.os_json, 'linux') || - contains(inputs.os_json, 'ubuntu-latest') || - contains(inputs.os_json, 'ubuntu-24.04-arm') - ) +if: inputs.build_wheels && (contains(inputs.os_json, 'ubuntu') || contains(inputs.os_json, 'linux')) Suggestion importance[1-10]: 7 __ Why: The current condition misses custom Ubuntu runners (e.g., ubuntu-22.04) by only checking specific labels. Restoring the general 'ubuntu' substring check fixes this functional regression for custom runners.	Medium
General	Simplify arch matrix condition The arch matrix condition is overly complex and relies on fragile operator precedence. Simplify it by breaking down the logic into explicit, parenthesized checks for readability and maintainability. .github/workflows/_build.yml [136] -arch: ${{ contains(inputs.os_json, 'linux') && fromJson('["x86_64","aarch64"]') || (contains(inputs.os_json, 'ubuntu-latest') && contains(inputs.os_json, 'ubuntu-24.04-arm')) && fromJson('["x86_64","aarch64"]') || contains(inputs.os_json, 'ubuntu-24.04-arm') && fromJson('["aarch64"]') || fromJson('["x86_64"]') }} +arch: ${{ + (contains(inputs.os_json, 'linux') || (contains(inputs.os_json, 'ubuntu-latest') && contains(inputs.os_json, 'ubuntu-24.04-arm'))) + ? fromJson('["x86_64", "aarch64"]') + : (contains(inputs.os_json, 'ubuntu-24.04-arm') ? fromJson('["aarch64"]') : fromJson('["x86_64"]')) +}} Suggestion importance[1-10]: 6 __ Why: The original arch matrix condition is overly complex and relies on fragile operator precedence. The simplified version uses explicit ternary logic for better readability and maintainability.	Low
	Restore descriptive job names The simplified job name no longer differentiates between different OSes (e.g., macOS arm64 vs x86_64) or Python versions, making the workflow UI confusing. Restore the original descriptive naming with matrix variables. .github/workflows/_build.yml [291] -name: Build non-Linux distributions +name: Build distribution on ${{ matrix.os == 'macos-latest' && 'macOS arm64 (macos-latest)' || matrix.os == 'macos-15-intel' && 'macOS x86_64 (macos-15-intel)' || matrix.os == 'windows-latest' && 'Windows x86_64 (windows-latest)' || matrix.os }} py${{ matrix.python-version }} Suggestion importance[1-10]: 5 __ Why: The simplified job name makes it hard to differentiate between different OSes and Python versions in the workflow UI. Restoring the original descriptive naming improves usability.	Low